Publication Ethic
Publication Ethics Statement
This Publication Ethics Statement strictly binds all parties involved in the publishing process, including the Publisher, Editorial Board, Reviewers, and Authors. The Journal enforces a zero-tolerance policy against any form of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, and undeclared conflicts of interest. We strictly adhere to the ethical guidelines set forth by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). The ultimate authority regarding the acceptance and publication of any manuscript rests immutably with the Editorial Board.
Author’s Duties
Originality & Plagiarism
Authors must present entirely original work containing an accurate account of the research performed. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute severe unethical behavior and are categorically unacceptable. Any form of plagiarism is grounds for immediate rejection.
Concurrent Publication
Authors are strictly prohibited from submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently. Submitting previously published research, or submitting to multiple venues simultaneously, constitutes severe academic misconduct.
Authorship Criteria
Authorship must be strictly limited to individuals who have made a substantial contribution to the research. The corresponding author bears absolute responsibility for ensuring all co-authors have reviewed and explicitly approved the final manuscript prior to submission.
Fundamental Errors
Should an author discover a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, it is their absolute obligation to immediately notify the Editorial Board. The author must actively cooperate with the editors to formally retract the paper or issue an appropriate erratum.
Reviewer’s Duties
Standard of Objectivity
Reviews must be conducted with strict objectivity. Referees must express their views clearly with robust, well-articulated supporting arguments. Ad hominem or personal criticism of the author is strictly prohibited and will invalidate the review.
Source Acknowledgements
Reviewers must boldly identify relevant published work that has not been cited. Any substantial similarity or alarming overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper must be immediately reported to the Editor.
Conflicts of Interest
Any invited referee with a potential conflict of interest—whether competitive, collaborative, or financial—must immediately decline the review invitation and notify the Editorial Board to ensure the integrity of the blind review process.
Editor’s Duties
Fair Play & Objectivity
Editors must evaluate manuscripts exclusively on the basis of their academic merit, intellectual content, and relevance to the journal's scope, without regard to the authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.
Strict Confidentiality
Editors and editorial staff must maintain strict confidentiality. They are expressly forbidden from disclosing any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, and the publisher.
Publication Decisions
The Editor-in-Chief holds the ultimate authority in deciding which articles are published. This decision is strictly guided by the journal's policies, legal constraints regarding copyright infringement, and a rigorous zero-tolerance policy on plagiarism.